Which statement does not explain continued hostilities between the US government and American Indians living on reservations? - Harsh conditions on most reservations made hunting and farming for subsistence impossible, leading to conflicts over access to resources.
- The Bureau of Indian Affairs’ mismanagement of reservation land resulted in shifting reservation borders and the loss of land promised to American Indians.
- Militaristic persecution of American Indians by cultural and religious interest groups forced American Indians to assimilate into white culture.
- White settlers used pressure and fraud to acquire American Indians’ land without just compensation.

Harsh conditions on most reservations made hunting and farming for subsistence impossible, leading to conflicts over access to resources.

Explanation:

There have been many sources of conflict between the U.S. Government and the American Indians in reservations such as the loss of land by American Indians due to the Bureau of Indian Affairs mismanaging lands belonging to reservations.

White settlers have also acquired land without just compensation and there have been militaristic persecution of American Indians by several groups.

Harsh conditions that led to conflicts over access to resources is not cause of conflict between the U.S. government and the American Indians.

- Harsh conditions on most reservations made hunting and farming for subsistence impossible, leading to conflicts over access to resources.

Explanation:

Because it is the "Correct Answer"

i also think he is correct. i believe they came to washington to protest their rights.

where are the answers

explanation:

be cause we need them