01.06 The Historian’s Clues—411 File Part 1: Using Sources
Complete for each source as you read the lesson. An example has been provided for you.

Type of source
Author
Audience Primary or
Secondary Source Purpose Reliability
Newspaper, diary, photograph, etc.

Who is the author?
What do you know about the author?
What are his or her biases, motives, etc.? Was the source created for the general public or personal use? Is this a primary or secondary source? Why was this source created? How reliable is this source? Why?
Diary

Will Anthony is the blacksmith who owns the shop. He reported the theft of the tools. He employs Matthew Farmer as an apprentice. He is feuding with James Ansley, another blacksmith in town.
Probably personal use since it is a diary and many people don’t expect others to read their diaries.
Primary since it was created at the time of the event.
Mr. Anthony probably created this for his own personal use.
People don’t usually lie in their diaries, so the following information from his diary is probably pretty reliable:

His apprentice has been having money problems since his father was injured.

The tools were stolen during the night.

He doesn’t recall making the tools that are recorded in his sales journal
Part 2: Complete a 3-2-1 Chart
This is called a 3-2-1 Chart and you will be completing one for each lesson in the course. Your instructor may ask you about these during your discussion-based assessments or other phone calls.

3 List three things you learned from this lesson.

2 List two things from this lesson that you feel are very important.

1 List one question you have from this lesson.

In the decision for dred scott vs.sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction

Virginia has 11 people in the house and 2 in the senate. how many electoral votes foes it have? where is this addressed?

Brainliestttme : ) -what reforms were made in communist china?