subject
History, 30.03.2021 19:00 hgfgu829

The original constitution protected the rights to trial by jury True or false​

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:30
Lucifer with lucifer, although an angel he and not a man, i purpose to begin. for notwithstanding angels cannot be the sport of fortune, yet he fell though sin down into hell, and he is yet therein, o lucifer, brightest of angels all. now thou art satan, and canst never win out of my miseries; how great they fall! adam consider adam, made by god's own fingerm and not begotten of man's unclean seed, he that in eden was allowed to linger - now call damascus- and had power at need over all paradise, save that decreed and single tree prohibited. than he none ever on earth stood higher, till his deed drove him to labour, hell and misery describe a theme that the author develops through these two excerpts. then analyze how the two excerpts interact and build on one another to develop this theme. be sure to use specific details from the text to support your ideas
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
What did the committees of correspondence do ? a) . all of these b). communicated c). contacted foreign government d). planned for actions the colonies took together
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
What explains the increase in life expectancy in botswana? a. the increased availability of jobs and an improved economy b. access to antiretroviral drugs, hiv/aids education, and widespread hiv/aids testing c. a series of military takeovers that stabilized the political system and led to education reform and increased literacy rates d. a recent military coup that led to an improved healthcare system select the best answer from the choices provided.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which statement in the passage best reflects sumer's opinion of the dred scott decision? a."i speak what cannot be denied." b."[the] judgment was sustained by a falsification of history." b."the opinion was more thoroughly abominable than anything history." i speak what cannot be denied when i declare that the opinion of the chief justice in the case of dred scott was more thoroughly abominable than anything of the kind in the history of courts. judicial baseness reached its lowest point on that occasion. you have not forgotten that terrible decision where a most unrighteous judgment was sustained by a falsification of history. -charles sumner, 1865
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
The original constitution protected the rights to trial by jury True or false​...
Questions
question
Arts, 05.11.2020 19:50
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 19:50
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 19:50
question
English, 05.11.2020 19:50
question
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 19:50
Questions on the website: 13722361