subject
History, 30.03.2021 20:30 eleaanastasiawo

Why of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary mouces for a historian? A. They can help a historian focus on important themes rather than an a specthe piece of evidence B. They can compare and contrast conclusions other historians have made about a time period O C. They can reveal how Individuals experiencinghistancal events actually reacted D. They can summarize a huge amount of data that a historian could not sort through alone​

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:00
Here’s the first one let me send the next page of the passage
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:30
Examine these two paintings that depict famous events from american history. the image on the left, painted in 1940, shows the signing of the u.s. constitution in 1787. the image on the right, painted in 1836, shows the american victory at the battle of yorktown in 1781.which of these paintings should be considered a secondary source?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
What was true about sharecropping? a. landowner provided free tools and seeds.b. workers could leave the land if they failed to make money.c. landowners often took advantage of workers.d. workers received ownership of the land they farmed after a set number of years.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
At the beginning of the war, why was hitler allowed to continue his aggression without resistance from other european countries
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Why of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary mouces for a histori...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.02.2020 05:52
question
Mathematics, 03.02.2020 05:53
question
Mathematics, 03.02.2020 05:53
Questions on the website: 13722362