The reasons for removing a dictator from his leadership is the freedom in people's choices. It is a form of government in which one person or little group have absolute power without any constitutional limitations. This is the most important argument against a dictatorship and what causes suppression of basic civil liberties. Also, dictators usually use force and/or fraude to gain their political power and maintain it through intimidation. However, to take the power off the dictator is a difficult thing because it usually it is happening in a weak social and political environment, which actually allows dictatorship to happen in the first place. For this reason, we could name some of the arguments for keeping a dictator in power: Whether we like it or not, this dictatorship somehow is holding the state together, so the intervention has to be well organized and study the social environment before the ending. The intervention can cause a big chaos and a protracted conflict can lead, as in this specific case, into hundreds of thousands of deaths, massive migration, and widespread sectarian violence. Of course the dictatorship is not a good option. The best way to end it has to contemplate possible new ways of organization, make sure how people will be leaded and how a new party is going to be elected in a representative way.

i hope this

explanation:

max weber's 3 types of authority. the sociologist and philosopher  max weber  distinguishes  three types of authority—charismatic,  traditional  and legal-rational—each of which corresponds to a brand of  leadership that is operative in contemporary society.

a big wall across the mexican border so no drugs, terrorist, or illegal immigrants can come through : )    

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this

number   5 i know this because savannah was the first capital and i took the test and all you have to do is look up a map of georgia savannah.