Can someone please help me on these 2 questions? What was the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott vs Sandford case?

That slavery diminished the national character.

That African Americans did not have the right to sue in federal court because they were not citizens.

That African American rights were protected by the Constitution.

That slavery should be abolished by executive order.

Explanation: Sandford, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that c and that  That slavery diminished the national character.That slavery diminished the national character.That slavery diminished the national character.v Sandford, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States; and thatvv Sandford, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7–2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States; and thatvc

1.a)britain

2.b)spain

3.c)french

4.d)portugal

explanation:

i am not 100% positive but i think it is is b. both are non-partisan jobs

i am pretty sure that members of congress have term limits, can be impeached, and are nominated through direct popular vote.