subject
History, 04.04.2021 07:00 niyyyareligion

I trust that we strongly agree with Dr. King's stand, while we find Governor Wallace's views very alien and wrong. However, let's be cool and detached historians and dissect both arguments. What kind of moral arguments they make for and against integration and equality? What are the legal, philosophical, and ethical foundations of their thinking?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:40
Why was the taiping rebellion significant
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
What primary benefit did theodore roosevelt’s see in digging a canal through panama?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
How long have counties been a part of the government structure of the united states?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
Why were the actions of native americans so varied in response to relocation? a. the tribes were very diverse and had different beliefs. b. they were exhausting every avenue. c. they all wanted to get the best financial arrangements. d. many of the tribes wanted ownership of the area.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
I trust that we strongly agree with Dr. King's stand, while we find Governor Wallace's views very al...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 19.01.2020 07:31
question
Mathematics, 19.01.2020 07:31
question
Mathematics, 19.01.2020 07:31
Questions on the website: 13722363