subject
History, 08.04.2021 19:50 addiemaygulley2835

In Gideon vs. Wainright (1963), the Supreme Court was asked to decide if a state court has to supply a lawyer to someone who can not afford one. How did the court rule? * The Court said that the state must provide a lawyer if you are too poor to afford one
The Court said that the state does not need to provide a lawyer no matter if the person is poor or not.
The Court said that the state should pay one-half of the lawyer's cost

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
What event caused south carolina to secede from union in 1860
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
How were japan's actions before and during world war 2 compare with germany's actions over the same period
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:50
Profit is the term for that is left over after the costs have been paid in a budget or business. a) money. b) supply. c) demand. d) tax
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:40
How did chris mccandless feel before and after going into the wild? i need with a compare and contrast slide for a project
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In Gideon vs. Wainright (1963), the Supreme Court was asked to decide if a state court has to supply...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
Social Studies, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
English, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
English, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
Social Studies, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
Social Studies, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 15.02.2021 14:00
question
Geography, 15.02.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722363