Explain ONE difference in the tactics individuals such as Gandhi and Che Guevara (or the groups they represent) adopted to achieve their political goals.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

One difference in the tactics individuals such as Gandhi and Che Guevara (or the groups they represent) adopted to achieve their political goal

The most important difference between Mahatma Gandhi and Ernesto "Che" Guevara was that Gandhi always used his non-violent approach to protest and organize demonstrations to liberate India from the oppressive British rule.

On the other hand, Guevara was a firm believer in the armed revolution to impose Communism. He always opposed the United States' fierce Capitalismin South America and its way to mess in the interests of these Latin American countries to the degree of deposing Presidents to put people that favored its economic interests, as was teh case of the assassination of Chilean President Salvador Allende.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

a big one is

to appoint and regulate officers of the land and naval forces,

which caused much controversy ending the articles