History, 13.04.2021 19:10 xavier0329

Please read this excerpt from Jackson's presidential address in 1830 on, "Indian Removal". "Can it be cruel in this Government when, by events which it cannot control, the Indian is made discontented in his ancient home to purchase his lands, to give him a new and extensive territory, to pay the expense of his removal, and support him a year in his new abode? How many thousands of our own people would gladly embrace the opportunity of removing to the West on such conditions! If the offers made to the Indians were extended to them, they would be hailed with gratitude and joy."

Compare and contrast this excerpt, with the perception that many people held about the lands that the tribes would be removed to (question 1). Please respond in TEE format, using part of this excerpt, and your answer from question 1, to compare and contrast perceptions on the land that the tribes would be removed to.

Please answer quickly!

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 14:00

Brainliesttt ( look at the image attached) according to the map, yugoslavia was no longer aligned with the soviet union after 1948 was a satellite nation of the united states after 1948 became a part of the soviet union in 1948 was never a part of the eastern bloc

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 14:10

How did emperor justinian’s review of roman laws create a more efficient legal system? a.he got rid of outdated and repetitive laws.b.he ranked the laws according to importance.c.he created new laws to address modern situations.d.he combined minor laws into stricter categories.ill mark brainliest

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 17:00

What are the reasons that some europeans moved and began colonizing the new world? select all that apply: options: better economic opportunities. some were escaping religious persecution. attempting to increase their wealth, despite the hardships and risks. the new world was safer and more secure than the old world.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 23:30

What was the difference between bombing military targets in the united kingdom, and bombing the city of london? a. bombing a city kills lots of innocent civilians, bombing a military target doesn't b. bombing military targets didn't force the u.k. to surrender, but bombing london did c. military targets were bombed by japan, while london was bombed by the nazis d. london was bombed before the u.s. entered the war; military targets were bombed afterward

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Please read this excerpt from Jackson's presidential address in 1830 on, "Indian Removal". "Can it...

Questions