subject
History, 14.04.2021 01:00 joeylozier15

HELP FAST PLZ Have you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising and found when describing the event that your story seems to change the more you tell it? Have you ever experienced a time when you couldn't really describe something you saw in a way that others could understand? If so, you may understand why some experts think eyewitness testimony is unreliable as evidence in scientific inquiries and trials. New insights into human memory suggest human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things.

First, memory is vague. Imagine your room at home or a classroom you see every day. Most likely, you could describe the room very generally. You could name the color of the walls, the floors, the decorations. But the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. Memory tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen rather than specific details. So when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall when faced with several tall people. There are lots of different kinds of "tall."

Second, memory uses general knowledge to fill in gaps. Our brains reconstruct events and scenes when we remember something. To do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. For example, one day at a library you go to quite frequently, you witness an argument between a library patron and one of the librarians. Later, when telling a friend about the event, your brain may remember a familiar librarian behind the desk rather than the actual participant simply because it is recreating a familiar scene. In effect, your brain is combining memories to help you tell the story.

Third, your memory changes over time. It also changes the more you retell the story. Documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. Research has also shown that the more a witness's account is told, the less accurate it is. You may have noticed this yourself. The next time you are retelling a story, notice what you add, or what your brain wants to add, to the account. You may also notice that you drop certain details from previous tellings of the story.

With individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. Did you really break your mother's favorite vase when you were three? Was that really your father throwing rocks into the river with you when you were seven? The human brain may be quite remarkable indeed. When it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture.

Which line from the text most clearly explains the main idea of the first paragraph? (5 points)

Have you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising
Human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things
Her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall
Documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:40
In which part of the united states did women first begin to get the right to vote? o a. the south o b. eastern coastal towns o c. the west o d. northern industrial cities
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
According to the document, why can't the pope and the catholic church in rome make decisions for england? use evidence.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
What makes fort sill historically unique among other regional military installations? a. it is the site where seven major commanders of us military efforts were trained. b. it houses the largest explosive weapons factory in the united states. c. it specializes in training soldiers to preserve the cultural artifacts of nations invaded by the us military. d. it is the oldest functioning installation in oklahoma.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
Which best describes why web dubois and booker t. washington's approaches to and strategies towards civil rights were so different? a.washington faced minimal and mild discrimination as he was raised in a prominent family in the north. dubois faced harsh discrimination, restrictions from jim crow laws, while growing up in the post-reconstructed south. b.dubois was fortunate enough to have parents who were well involved in politics, rising from smaller government positions to higher federal positions, while washington was raised by uneducated and politically excluded slave parents. c.washington was unwilling to speak out publicly, which restricted the audience he reached, thus the support he gained, while dubois spoke eloquently to small and large audiences, thus able to gain more personal and monetary support. d.dubois was born in the north, earned his doctorate from harvard, after having scholarships from other prestigious institutions, while washington was born a southern slave, and his determination allowed him to gain education and respect as a leader.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
HELP FAST PLZ Have you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising and found when desc...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 18.03.2021 01:50
Questions on the website: 13722361