subject
History, 17.09.2019 16:10 22mhenton

What argument is susan b. anthony making in the passage? male citizens created the laws to secure the rights of men, so legal reform is required to secure women’s rights. women are often punished for committing criminal acts that are pardoned when committed by men. women are judged under laws supposedly written only for males, so they are entitled to the same rights as males. the court judge modified the origiis it a crime for a citizen of the united states to vote?
by susan b. anthony (excerpt)
but is urged, the use of the masculine pronouns he, his and him, in all the constitutions and laws, is proof that only men were meant to be included in their provisions. if you insist on this version of the letter of the law, we shall insist that you be consistent, and accept the other horn of the dilemma, which would compel you to exempt women from taxation for the support of the government, and from penalties for the violation of laws.
. . the same is true of all the criminal laws: "no person shall be compelled to be a witness against himself."
the same with the law of may 31st, 1870, the 19th section of which i am charged with having violated; not only are all the pronouns in it masculine, but everybody knows that that particular section was intended expressly to hinder the rebels from voting. it reads "if any person shall knowingly vote without his having a lawful right," c. precisely so with all the papers served on me-the u. s. marshal's warrant, the bail-bond, the petition for habeas corpus, the bill of indictment-not one of them had a feminine pronoun printed in it; but, to make them applicable to me, the clerk of the court made a little carat at the left of "he" and placed an "s" over it, thus making she out of he. then the letters "is" were scratched out, the little carat under and "er" over, to make her out of his, and i insist if government officials may thus manipulate the pronouns to tax, fine, imprison and hang women, women may take the same liberty with them to secure to themselves their right to a voice in the government. nal documents to arrest and try anthony unfairly.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
What reason did yurovsky give nicholas ii for his pending execution? the czar’s relatives were about to rescue the romanovs. nicholas had committed crimes against the russians. nicholas had misused his power to abuse his own people. nicholas had not lived up to his duties as czar of russia. the answers are not b and c, i already tried those.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
Most members of the socialist party of america believed that the government should protect workers by: a.) operating big businesses. b.) outlawing strikes. c.) outlawing unions. d.) all of the above.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:00
How were the economies of the inca empire and ancient river valley civilizations such as egypt and phoenicia different?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:00
What were the causes and effects of the war in 1812
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What argument is susan b. anthony making in the passage? male citizens created the laws to secure t...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.01.2021 03:10
question
Chemistry, 04.01.2021 03:10
question
Mathematics, 04.01.2021 03:10
question
Computers and Technology, 04.01.2021 03:10
question
Mathematics, 04.01.2021 03:10
question
Mathematics, 04.01.2021 03:10
Questions on the website: 13722360