How did the monarchies of england and france affect their societies differently?
absolute monarchy in france led to continued acceptance of serfdom, while in england serfdom disappeared.
constitutional monarchy in england led to representative government without a revolution, while france required a revolution.
absolutism in france delayed the intellectual enlightenment, while england's constitutional monarchy fostered the enlightenment.
england's constitutional monarchy efficiently corrected the ills of poverty, while in france the monarchy ignored the poor.

the han greatly expands the chinese empire. the han dynasty retains the centralized bureaucracy and unified political system of the qin but adopts and grafts upon this the confucian view that government should be run by educated, ethical men.

explanation:

so, based on the research i've done. the u.s. government were always on a wild goose chase just to take down castro. he then retired his trone to his brother raul in 2008 due to some health issues. so it's obvious your answer would be:

castro had no allies from which he could receive aid.

hope this and have a fantastic day!

                                                    -wolfiewolffromsketch