Which sentence best summarizes the system of government that darius i introduced in the persian empire?
he split the empire into provinces headed by local leaders, but he kept the military under his control.
he divided the empire into independent kingdoms whose kings had to pay a yearly fee to him.
he created councils to rule over towns and villages and ruled the council leaders from his capital.
he created a single, central, governing body whose decisions were applied throughout the empire.

The sentence that best summarizes the system of government that Darius I introduced in the Persian Empire is the first one of the chart, that says that he split the empire into provinces headed by local leaders, but he kept the military under his control.

Darius I was the third king of the Achaemenid dynasty of Persia from the year 521 to 486 BC; he inherited the Persian Empire at its zenith; including the Iranian territories, Elam, Mesopotamia, Syria, Egypt, the north of India and the Greek colonies of Anatolia.

Darius I divided the Persian territory into satrapies, assigning his management to a powerful governor, with wide powers, the satrap; but maintaining military power for himself. He implanted a unified monetary system, organized the traditional legal codes of Egypt and made Aramaic the administrative language of the western regions of the empire. He also promoted construction projects, especially in Susa, Pasargada, Persepolis, Babylon and Egypt.

fourteenth amendment

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!