Many floridians are concerned about gun control. some people believe that limiting access to firearms may make the nation safer. others believe that this goes against their rights as americans. what about a compromise? keep all firearms, but add a new, large tax on ammunition. which change to the article would show bias in favor of one side of the gun-control debate?

Most people know that limited access to firearms would make the nation safer.

Explanation:

The phrase "Most people know that limited access to firearms would make the nation safer." represents the necessary move to change the article to show a bias in favor of one side of the arms control debate

When it comes to the debate on the release of firearms to civil citizens in the US, there are two strong and opposing views. Some want the release to be maintained, because they believe it will be responsible for their own security, as well as guaranteeing their hardship as an American. On the other hand, others demand more control or even a ban on the release of weapons, as they believe they are extremely dangerous and are mainly responsible for the mass shootings that take place in the country.

i just need the points

explanation: