When will a propaganda campaign intentionally aim to hurt a cause? when the cause is unpopular with citizens when the cause requires sacrifice when the cause needs more publicity when the cause has an enemy’s support

D. when the cause has an enemy’s support.

Explanation:

Propaganda isn't awful by its tendency (all things considered, any substance that transfers data can be viewed as a type of promulgation). Consider, talk has been for quite some time examined as the craft of successful influence in discourse. Molding discernment and impacting should be possible in a good, indecent, or irreverent way, either to serve the one, few, or many, either for an extraordinary intrigue or the general intrigue. Along these lines, how we should see purposeful publicity relies upon the expectations, explicit strategies utilized, and setting. On this page, we center around battling and getting out "negative publicity" that utilizes a dark cap and dim cap strategies (instead of white-cap). How about we call the terrible kind "negative" and the great kind "positive." If we don't mean the sort, look to the setting in which the term is utilized.

the u.s. department of labor is a cabinet-level federal agency that supports the american labor force. it has three overall functions. first, it protects the rights of workers and retirees. second, it provides job training. third, it provides statistics related to working, prices, and income.

question 10: the answer is c, to their constituents address a problem.

question 11: i think it would be domestic bills, which deal with american issues only and public bills, which affect the whole nation.