An effect of the supreme court’s ruling in scott v. sandford was thatlegal protection for slavery was strengthened. legal protection for slavery was weakened. the abolitionist movement was strengthened. the missouri compromise was strengthened.

A) Legal protection for slavery was stregnthened.

Explanation:

The Scott vs. Sandford case was one in which Dred Scott, a slave, sued for his freedom. Scott sued for his freedom because his owner brought him to live in a territory that outlawed this institution. Scott believed that living in a free territory made him free.

However, the Supreme Court ruled against Scott and stated that slaves are not people. Rather, they are property. This means they have no legal rights. This ruling allowed slavery to exist in any part of the US, making the institution of slavery stronger within the US.

Legal protection for slavery was strengthened is the correct answer.

Explanation:

Scott V. Stanford was the famous supreme court case in which the court ruled that US constitution could not include the black people as American citizens no matte they were free or enslaves, so the rights of the American citizens is not applicable to them. It was decision made in the Dred Scott case. Dredd Scot was a slave and his owners took him to Missouri. He filed as case claiming that he was no longer a slave because he became a free man when his owners brought him into the Missouri Territory. Missouri had been declared as a free state by the Missouri Compromise.

democracy

explanation: