Most nations that discuss the issue of palestinian independence call for a

one-state solution.
two-state solution.
three-state solution.
four-state solution.

Most nations that discuss the issue of Palestinian independence call for a two-state solution.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is very ancient. Tensions between Jewish and Arab communities have lasted for centuries in this region. They increased during the twentieth century especially after 1948, when Palestine was divided by united nations into three sectors such as an Arab sector, a Jewish sector, and a shared international sector. Both sides have never accepted this division and claim each more territory. This struggle has caused many deaths over the past 70 years through wars and terrorist attacks.

To solve the problem, most of the countries in the United Nations would like to create two distinct states, one for the Jews and one for the Arabs. Unfortunately, the two communities can not agree on these new frontiers. Israelis don’t want to abandon the settlements that they founded on Palestinian territory and do not trust their Arab neighbors. On the other hand, violent terrorist organizations still exist in Palestine and do not agree to negotiate. That’s why this conflict has continued for all those years without a concrete solution that seems possible shortly.

Subject: History

Chapter: Wars of the 20th Century

Keywords: the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, tensions between Israel and Palestine, the policy of the United Nations

The correct answer is "Two-state solution".

This term refers to the idea that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict should be resolved by the establishment of two separate independent states: the State of Palestine, and the State of Israel. The borders between the territories are still subject to discussion, and this is a crucial factor preventing resolution to this day. However, multiple polls have shown that most Israeli and Palestinian civilians are in favor of a negotiated settlement on the creation of two separate states.

Hope this helps!

for starters, there is the structural trend of rising primary government expenditure as a share of gdp, which reached 36% in 2014, up from 22% in 1991. this increase reflected a political desire to address the poverty and inequality that had gone unaddressed during previous decades. to support the increase, brazil’s government increased taxes on consumption and promoted progress toward labor-market formalization. nonetheless, public investment, particularly in infrastructure, took a hit. in fact, with the exception of the 2005-2008 period, total investment as a share of gdp has remained below 20% since 1991.

d. it spread christianity. i just took the test and got it right.