How did trade in saharan africa differ from indian ocean trade?

a. saharan african trade focused on salt and silver, whereas indian ocean trade focused on fish and cattle.

b. saharan african trade relied on silk and silver, whereas indian ocean trade relied on gold and salt.

c. saharan african trade relied on the region's rivers, whereas indian ocean trade relied on monsoon winds.

d. saharan african trade was land based, whereas indian ocean trade relied on water routes.

D. Saharan African trade was land based, whereas Indian Ocean trade relied on water routes.

Explanation:

Since antiquity, trade in Saharan Africa was traso by land and proposed the exchange of bienens for gold, silver or salt, however trade in the Indian Ocean was based on the sea routes that were developed over time. hand of different cultures and empires that ruled the area, and also European empires.

the results of roman expansion produced social conflict and civil war. julius caesar gained power and became a dictator but was then assassinated. the reign of augustus began a long period of imperial rule and peace in the roman empire. rome faced the problems of how to maintain peace, law, and order.

hope this !

brainliest?