Which best describes why the sizes of farms in new england were different from farms in the southern colonies?

a)in new england, the soil was rich, the land was flat, and the growing season was long, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies.

b)in new england, the soil was poor, the land was hilly, and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

c) in new england, the soil was rich, the land was covered in forests, and the growing season was short, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies.

d) in new england, the soil was poor, the rivers were distant, and the growing season was long, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

b) In New England, the soil was poor, the land was hilly, and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

Explanation:

This is the statement that best describes the reason why the farms in New England were smaller than those in the Southern colonies. In New England, the conditions of the environment were not as well-suited to agriculture as those in the South. As the two areas developed, this led to the South focusing on agriculture heavily, while the North was able to develop more varied industries.

hi friend   look late me tall   you with my experience first politic because this subject   it is more politic than be religious   and also give you my experience in islam

first   the islam it is not religion order to kill for we be clear .

so bin laden he not was man of religion   for he use they taught sound islamic theology.

osama bin laden he was influenced by mullah mohammad omar, a very radical manosama bin laden's little understanding of religion has made osama bin laden's speech radical and deviated from the teachings of islam

so the answer > they used radical persuasive rhetoric