Which answer best explains the cherokee's main argument against georgia in cherokee nation v. georgia? (5 points)
the cherokee argued they had legally bought their land from other tribes.
the cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.
the cherokee argued they had already signed an agreement with the federal government.
the cherokee argued they had given all their land to the missions so georgia had no case. description

The Cherokee argued they were a separate nation and not bound by state laws.

Explanation:

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, it was a case of the Supreme Court of the United States. The Cherokee Nation applied for a federal court order against the laws passed by the State of Georgia of the United States. UU That deprived them of rights within their limits, but the Supreme Court did not hear the case on its merits. It was ruled that he had no original jurisdiction in the matter, since the Cherokees were a dependent nation, with a relationship to the United States as that of a "ward to his guardian," as Judge Marshall said.

what precedent do you see the ordinance of 1787 setting for the 1st amendment of the us constitution : )

this person under me, copied me. owo

the word that best sums up the tone of the newspaper regarding the treaty of versailles is resentful.