History, 15.10.2019 12:50 sofietyeweirdo

Compare and contrast the approach of the black panthers and martin luther king. do you think black militancy in the 1960s or hurt the cause of civil rights?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: jaylaa04

Martin Luther King Jr. taught nonviolent protests and working through the system to change it. He wanted to show the establishment that it was time to change through peaceful means.

The Black Panthers, in the other hand, wanted to show the strength of the black man. They believed the only way they were going to get change was through force and threats.

I think the black militancy of the 1960s hurt the cause of civil rights. The people who held outdated beliefs about blacks that they were savage and a lower race than whites took the violence of the Black Panthers as proof of their bigotry. They didn't even hear the peaceful messages of MLK and others like him. It took a lot longer to get equal rights legislation passed than I believe it would have without the actions of the Black Panthers.

Answer from: CoolxBreeze

Martin Luther King Jr. advocated for nonviolent protests and working inside the system to bring about change. He wanted to demonstrate to the establishment that it was time for peaceful change.

The Black Panthers, on the other hand, sought to demonstrate the black man's strength. They felt that the only way to effect change was to use force and threats.

About Black Panthers and Martin Luther King:

I believe that the 1960s black militancy harmed the civil rights movement. People who held antiquated stereotypes about blacks, such as that they were savages and of a lower rate than whites, saw the Black Panthers' violence as proof of their prejudice. They didn't even pay attention to MLK's and others' nonviolent teachings. Without the Black Panthers' actions, I believe it would have taken much longer to pass equal rights legislation.

For more information about Black Panthers and Martin Luther King refer to the link:

link

Answer from: Quest

abraham lincoln

Answer from: Quest

the right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "their policy of "divide and rule" pitted political groups against each other to keep any one group from becoming too powerful. " the participant in european imperialism is being described below is that their policy of "divide and rule" pitted political groups against each other to keep any one group from becoming too powerful.

Another question on History

History, 22.06.2019 05:20

What type of monarch was fredrick the great ?

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 09:00

1400s to 1700s: power shifted to persians and ottoman turks of southwest asia, who fought for 300 years in the region. true or false?

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 12:30

How many tell them how to worship and show respect to god?

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 14:00

Consider the following invention from the american industrial era. cotton gin – a machine that removed seeds from short-staple cotton which option explains how this invention contributed to the role of the united states as an emerging world power? a. it was in high demand abroad, as many european nations had begun farming cotton. b. it led to the decline of slavery in the south, which enhanced america’s international reputation. c. it freed up many slaves to become factory workers in northern cities, which improved the economy. d. it increased production efficiency of a us cash crop that was in high demand in other nations.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Compare and contrast the approach of the black panthers and martin luther king. do you think black m...

Questions