Is the "just peace" or the "peace of vengeance" a better policy? why?

Just peace is a better policy.

Explanation:

Just peace was a policy that sought to avoid conflict by assuming that all people of all nations were equal and had the same rights. On the other hand, the Peace of Revenge was a policy that preached that the lands of the conquered countries had to be linked to the colonial lands to generate more power and control to the colonizers.

Depending on your point of view, you may think that peace of vengeance is a better policy, but it is always better to establish equal among all and avoid unnecessary conflicts.

the mongolian invasion of china and central asia resulted in a disruption of the silk road as the chinese garrisons lost support from the chinese kingdoms which fell under the mongols. however, as the mongols established a formal dynasty in china, the successors of genghis khan restored the garrisons along the silk road allowing the safe travel caravans again.

answer: d. joseph james clark​

explanation: