Read this statement: "the study of the same historical event is dynamic and, as such, can change over time." what is the best evaluation of the statement's validity?

Explanation:

Historians can't be orthodox in their interpretations, because here a point of view is based on external evidence, which are other's people perspective.

For example, you are a historian. So, right now you are studying some theme, but the important events are in the past, and this obligate you to recover information interviewing the old people. This means that your research is gonna be based in others opinions, and this opinions could change because it has subjective information.

So, due to that subjectivity, historians can't be orthodox.

i think the answer is a and i hope this ; ))

the industrial revolution pushed the world into modern industrialization. it changed the course of history profoundly. it caused rapid urbanization and pushed cities and countries into development. the industrial revolution began in great britain with a series with new inventions which led to the creation of machines and mass production.

this caused the country to gain wealth and money and become an international superpower. it improved transportation and manufacturing inside the country, pushed people to live in urban areas and britain to become the most powerful nation in the world for a while.