Which best describes how consequences are different from costs when making a decision?
consequences are generally positive.
consequences are generally negative.
consequences require giving something up.
consequences require accepting an outcome.

The correct answer is Consequences requiree accepting an outcome.

The first two statements are incorrect, as consequences are really dependent on the person/situation. Some individuals may have an overwhelming amount of good consequences while others may receive almost exclusively negative consequences.

The third statement is incorrect because this option defines what a cost is. This is why only the fourth statement can be correct, as consequences are a result of a certain action that has already taken place.

pope john paul ii ( his real name is karol wojtyla) and lech walesa ( the leader of the solidarity movement ) were both born in poland.

"the sepoy rebellion was the result of many, many influences and stressors on the cultures of india living under british rule. in britain, it's called the sepoy mutiny on the indian mutiny, but in india, it's called the first war of independence.

the main reason is concerned to the british paramountcy , the belief in british   dominance in india political, economic and cultural life had been introduced in india about 1820."

"they were forced to grow crops that benefited the colonizing nations instead of feeding their own people."

read more on -

explanation: