subject
History, 06.10.2019 09:50 brandon1748

Why did the british argue against starting a second front in europe?
a. if the allies invaded france, the germans would focus their efforts on defeating the soviet union.
b. the allies did not have enough troops to fully support an attack on france.
c. the german troops were deeply embedded in europe; the attack might not be successful.
d. an invasion in europe could have caused the soviet union to form an alliance with germany.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 16:00
Secretary of state kissinger engaged in to reach a cease-fire between israel and arab nations.
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:10
Interest groups are protected by the first amendment guarantees of petition. and what other freedom?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Why might the greeck city states have an advantage over the persians
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What is the significance of the battle of saratoga? a. the defeat at saratoga allowed the british to invade new england by land. b. after the defeat at saratoga france refuse to sign a treaty with the united states. c. the british won a decisive victory at saratoga. d. after the victory at saratoga france gave open support to the united states including arms money and ships.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why did the british argue against starting a second front in europe?
a. if the allies invaded...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.05.2021 06:10
question
Mathematics, 25.05.2021 06:10
question
Mathematics, 25.05.2021 06:10
question
Mathematics, 25.05.2021 06:10
question
Biology, 25.05.2021 06:10
question
English, 25.05.2021 06:10
question
Spanish, 25.05.2021 06:10
question
Physics, 25.05.2021 06:10
Questions on the website: 13722366