How did european imperialism in india differ from european imperialism in china during the 18th and 19th centuries?
a. europeans took almost absolute control over india’s government, but focused only on securing trading rights in china.
b. europeans were concerned only with exporting goods to markets in india, but were concerned only with importing goods from china.
c. europeans used military force to take control of china, but used diplomacy to establish trade colonies in india.
d. europeans contributed to economic collapse in india, but contributed to strengthening the economy in china.

A. Europeans took almost absolute control over India’s government, but focused only on securing trading rights in China.

Explanation:

English imperialism in China and India brought altogether different reactions, to a limited extent on account of the idea of colonialism in each spot. While the two districts were incredibly impacted by the British, in India the nation was put under the immediate guideline of the Queen. In China then again, the "ranges of prominence"spheres of influence were financial, and did not involve direct British principle. Amid the British magnificent age the way of life of China proceeded on much equivalent to it had previously, while in India the British attempted to supplant the Indian culture with their own. English influence in China started with the presentation of the opium drug. In England this medication was at that point generally being used, even among Christians.

can i know the options so i can answer the qu

the industrial development of cities in the ruhr area in the nineteenth century is described. the research was based on english and german language sources. several factors that shaped growth and paths of the cities were categorized and analyzed. they are locations, resources, traditions, entrepreneurs, and technological developments. locations and resources were the most important among them; other factors may be regarded as consequences from locations and resources. among the cities, bochum, essen, gelsenkirchen, and dortmund had the richest resources and most favorable locations in the transportation network and grew to be the largest cities in the ruhr area near the end of the nineteenth century. riverside location was also a favorable factor for the development, as shown in the development of duisburg on the confluence of rhine and ruhr. resource distribution can explain the rise of textile industry, metallurgical industry, and coal and iron industries, and the northward progression of the mining industry. tradition was an important factor for cities such as krefeld, barmen, elberfeld, solingen, and remscheid, which experienced development based on their traditions through the nineteenth century. various entrepreneurs exerted influences within and beyond the local level over the ruhr area. technological development stimulated the northward progression of the mining industry and the deep connection between the coal and the iron industries.