What are the arguments for and against government regulation of businesses and industries in a capitalist system explain which side of the argument you favor with appropriate evidence

Those who oppose regulation of industries in a capitalist system often argue that regulation leads to inefficiency. The argument is that economics runs as a naturally regulated system (often referred to as the "invisible hand") and intervention by governments ruins the natural balance of industries, leading to a bad economy. Therefore, lack of regulations should lead to higher profits and more competitive industries.

Those who support regulation argue that in the pursuit of efficiency, profits are given more importance than human lives, and industries get a free pass to do anything they need to do in order to get more profits, whether this includes violation of human rights, unethical practices, encouraging consumerism, damage to the welfare state, massive layoffs, etc. They also argue that there is very little evidence to support the idea of the "invisible hand" actually improving economy.

the answer you are looking for is letter c. he supported the idea of a un-run war in serbia to bring peace to the area.

supporting this idea was an important step that bill clinton took in order to attempt to secure bosnia and keep the peace there. he led peace reconciliations -known as the dayton agreement- leaving bosnia as a single state made up of two parts with one central government.

doat means to cherish based on the key word fancying and that it is a living thing