Why did france want to westernize its new colonies in africa and southeast asia?
the colonies had no forms of government and needed from the french.
the french believed that the new colonies’ cultures were inferior to their own.
the colonies wanted to keep their own cultures, and the french agreed.
the french believed that the colonies were strong enough to stand on their own.

Explanation:

The first period of European colonization of Southeast Asia occurred all through the sixteenth and seventeenth hundreds of years after the landing of Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish and later French and British marine zest dealers. Wildly focused, the Europeans before long looked to take out one another by coercively assuming responsibility for the creation focuses, exchange center points, and imperative key areas, starting with the Portuguese procurement of Malacca in 1511.  

All through the seventeenth and eighteenth hundreds of years, triumphs concentrated on ports along the sea courses, that gave a protected entry of oceanic exchange. It likewise enabled outside rulers to require expenses and control costs of the exceedingly wanted Southeast Asian wares.  

By the nineteenth century, for all intents and purposes all Southeast Asian grounds had been constrained into the different ranges of authority of European worldwide players. Siam, which had filled in as a helpful cushion state, sandwiched between British Burma and French Indochina was the main nation to maintain a strategic distance from direct outside standard. Nonetheless, its lords needed to fight with rehashed embarrassments, acknowledge unequal bargains among enormous British and French political obstruction and regional misfortunes after the Franco-Siamese War in 1893 and the Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909.

answer: the answer is b

explanation: i just took this quiz last week

the years following the end of world war i were a period of deep social tensions, aggrevated by high wartime inflation. food prices more than doubled between 1915 and 1920; clothing costs more than tripled. a steel strike that began in chicago in 1919 became much more than a simple dispute between labor and management. the steel strike of 1919 became the focal point for profound social anxieties, especially fears of bolshevism.

organized labor had grown in strength during the course of the war. many unions won recognition and the 12-hour workday was abolished. an 8-hour days was instituted on war contract work and by 1919, half the country's workers had a 48-hour work week.

the war's end, however, was accompanied by labor turmoil, as labor demanded union recognition, shorter hours, and raises exceeding the inflation rate. over 4 million workers--one fifth of the nation's workforce--participated in strikes in 1919, including 365,000 steelworkers and 400,000 miners. the number of striking workers would not be matched until the depression year of 1937.

the year began with a general strike in seattle. police offers in boston went on strike, touching off several days of rioting and crime. but the most tumultuous strike took place in the steel industry. then some 350,000 steelworkers in 24 separate craft union went on strike as part of a drive by the american federation of labor to unionize the industry. from management's perspective, the steel strike represented the handiwork of radicals and professional labor agitators. the steel industry's leaders regarded the strike as a radical conspiracy to get the company to pay a 12-hour wage for eight hours' work. at a time when communists were seizing power in hungary and were staging a revolt in germany, and workers in italy were seizing factories, some industrialists feared that the steel strike was the first step toward overturning the industrial system.

the strike ended with the complete defeat of the unions. from labor's perspective, the corporations had triumphed through espionage, blacklists, and the denial of freedom of speech and assembly and through the complete unwillingness to recognize the right of collective bargaining with the workers' representatives.

during the 1920s, many of labor's gains during world war i and the progressive era were rolled back. membership in labor unions fell from 5 million to 3 million. the us supreme court outlawed picketing, overturned national child labor laws, and abolished minimum wage laws for women.