Which sentence would be the best thesis statement for an argumentative essay supporting american use of the atomic bomb?
harry truman’s difficult decision to use atomic bombs against japan ended the war, saved lives, and secured a lasting peace.
on august 6, 1945, the us air force dropped an atomic bomb on hiroshima, japan, killing more than 70,000 people.
many scientists, including albert einstein, opposed the development and use of further nuclear weapons.
i think president truman was right to drop an atomic bomb on hiroshima because i would have made the same decision.

The correct answer is:  

Harry Truman’s difficult decision to use atomic bombs against Japan ended the war, saved lives, and secured a lasting peace.

On August 6, 1945, President Harry S. Truman having been warned by his advisers that any effort to penetrate Japan would result in terrible American losses, decided that the atomic bomb should be used to take the war to a rapid end. Finally, the American bomber Enola Gay released a five-ton bomb over Hiroshima.

answer: born in saint-dié, in the vosges department, france, he studied law, and was called to the bar at paris in 1854,[2] but soon went into politics, contributing to various newspapers, particularly to le temps. he attacked the second french empire with great violence, directing his opposition especially against baron haussmann, prefect of the seine department. a series of his articles in le temps was later republished as the fantastic tales of haussmannlaxupa (1868).[2]

explanation:

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.