Although the speech in question was suppressed, the court in gitlow v. new york held that not all forms of can be limited. hate speech symbolic speech political speech fighting words obscenity

The correct answer should be political speech. Although free speech exists and is established under the first amendment, the court came to the verdict that advocating the unlawful removal of a government in violent means in still prohibited because it calls for violence and something that is not legitimate, and is therefore banned.