Many argue it would be beneficial to have few elections because
a. so many candidates in one party can be confusing
b. there are too many candidates and referendums to vote on
c. fewer elections would bring a higher voter turnout
d. fewer elections would mean regulating the terms of elected officials to four years

The correct answer is:

C. fewer elections would bring a higher voter turnout

The main benefit is that more people would vote. With the high number of elections few people decide since others are apathetic or don't care about the local elections. If the number of elections decreases people probably will participate more.

(b) britain had a much larger navy than the u.s.

(d) the u.s. had a small army compared to britain.