subject
History, 29.01.2020 09:54 Arealbot

Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

a. to find out how people currently remember the event

b. to view a collection of different opinions on the event

c. to provide a scholarly perspective on the event

d. to evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 00:20
During the eisenhower administration, the u.s. began to take an active military role supporting the government of o o a. south africa o b. burma (myanmar) o oc. finland od. south vietnam
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
What were two reasons for world war ii? -separation of nationalities -territorial disputes over lost territories -settlement in the previous war suited the monarchs
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:30
Brainliesttt !me : )) -how do the international monetary fund and group of 8 encourage economic growth and limit abuse?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:30
Asap study the map above. summarize the data shown on the map, and explain its significance relative to international events in 2007. what is the push factor? answer the following questions: what is the total number of people displaced within iraq? what is the total number of people who have migrated outside of iraq? have most refugees remained within the region or traveled abroad? to what country have most refugees within the region gone? identify three potential effects of the refugees on the destination countries. identify two potential pull factors that might induce them to return to iraq.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historica...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.07.2019 13:00
question
Computers and Technology, 25.07.2019 13:00
Questions on the website: 13722367