subject
History, 08.10.2019 13:30 lilswetheart2007

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?

a. to hear about the event from someone who was directly involved

b. to learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

c. to see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it

d. to understand how people felt during the period when the event happened

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Brainliesttt !me : ) how did the japanese economy recover so quickly after world war ii? mass immigration to japan in an effort to rebuild economic and educational reforms passed by the government an economic partnership with korea and china marshall plan dollars stimulated the japanese economy
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
How did a woman’s education differ from a man’s education prior to the mid-19th century? a.women’s schools were unsanitary. b.women’s teachers were inadequate. c.women’s opportunities were unequal. d.women’s schools were more expensive
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:20
Which of these rose during the great depression?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
The map shows latitudes and longitudes of australia. which australian city is located north of the 15°s latitude? perth brisbane melbourne darwin
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historica...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 10.07.2019 21:30
question
English, 10.07.2019 21:30
question
History, 10.07.2019 21:30
Questions on the website: 13722360