What was the last armed conflict to take place between the native americans and the u. s. army?

Battle of Wounded knee

Further Explanations:

The battle of Wounded knee was a domiciliary massacre of numerous Lakota Indians by the soldiers of the United States.that occurred on 29th December 1890. The massacre occurred near the wounded Knee Creek in the US states of South Dhoka in an attempt to demilitarize the Lakota camp in which most women and children got killed. On 29th December The US cavalry went into the camp to demilitarize the Lakota and in the verge of disarming a deaf man named Black Coyote denied to gave his rifle saying that he had paid for it and threw it near an old man performing rituals called Balck ghost. At the very next time, the Us troops started firing and when the firing stopped around 300 men, children and women were already shot dead. The Lakota warrior also fought back and in the massacre, 25 soldiers died and thirty-nine got wounded.  

The Wounded Knee battlefield has been declared as a National Historic Landmark by the US Department of Interior and a resolution is being passed by the Congress expressing regret for the massacre.

Learn more

1. though the outcomes of Schenck and new york times differed, what did these decisions have in common? the government has a heavy burden to prove harm. the government can limit speech that causes harm. the government has unlimited power to limit speech. the government must follow the first amendment.?

2. why did president Reagan call for soviet leader Gorbachev to “tear down” the berlin wall?

3. which of these was one of the few successes of the united states government under the articles of confederation?

Answer Details

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter:The battle of Wounded knee

Keywords:Wounded knee, domiciliary, massacre, Lakota Indians, United States, wounded Knee Creek, South Dhoka, Black Coyote, Balck ghost, National Historic Landmark

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005

i'm pretty sure the answer would be

c. england

hope this best of luck sorry if i'm wrong

~animaljamissofab ♥