50+25 points
using the bible and other sources, write a 500-word report comparing the reigns and the character of rehoboam and jeroboam.
i just need some main points that i can cover.

Rehoboam was the heir of Solomon's throne

Jeroboam was an officer of Solomon's

Jeroboam was promised the 10 tribes of Israel because Solomon broke away from God (However, God promised David, Rehoboams, grandfather that he would always have a heir on the throne)

Rehoboam was left with Judah and Benjamin.

Rehoboam's father, Solomon, actually tried to kill Jeroboam, and so Jeroboam had to flee to Egypt. Jeroboam returned after the death of Solomon, and was appointed by the people too act as their spokesman to Rehoboam to petition for "to lighten [their] loads".

Both Rehoboam and Jeroboam was known as 'evil kings'

Rehoboam actually wanted to try to gain control of all of Israel, but God told him to not attack his brethren, and so he did not

Explanation:

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.