Central to the nullification crisis during jackson’s presidency, was the notion that
a. congress could nullify executive orders if they did not agree with the president
b. the supreme court could nullify state laws if the latter were deemed unconstitutional
c. states could nullify, and therefore not obey, any duly passed national law that they deemed objectionable or unconstitutional
d. the state of georgia was nullifying (by ignoring) the supreme court findings of cherokee nation v georgia and worcester v georgia.

Henry h. amringe commented in reaction to the 1850 women’s rights convention. women in europe may fill the throne, as reigning monarchs. shall they who are thought worthy of the highest station, in hereditary monarchies, be deemed unworthy of election to office, by the suffrages of a free people? if women, placed in the administration of great and vast national affairs, by the mere accident of birth, have acted wisely, much more might we expect not wisdom only, but integrity in the government of women, selected by free citizens, with a view to mental and moral fitness. short-answer questions where did henry amringe make these comments? what argument does amringe give to support his views?