It is...[the]duty of the judicial [branch] to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must...interpret that rule... So, if a law [conflicts with] the Constitution,...the Court must either decide that case [in favor of] the law... This is the very essence of judicial duty.

What conclusion did the Court reach to solve the problem identified in the passage?

just run

explanation: if you are fast enough they wont catch you fam

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

no statements but ok.

the statement that best describes the idea of manifest destiny that was used in the 19th century would be that "it was fate that the united states would continue to  expand westward," since people thought the us was "destined" to do so. 

propriety is the answer. hope this !

explanation: