subject
History, 07.05.2021 19:20 Jwhite8602

Why would a mutual fund, a collection of stocks, bonds, and other securities, have less risk than investing in stocks alone? a.
Stocks are higher risk than most other securities in a mutual fund, but when averaged with the risk of the other securities, mutual fund risk is not as high as stock risk.
b.
Mutual funds are controlled primarily by their investors, and those investors would do anything they could to keep their mutual fund from decreasing in value.
c.
Because mutual funds eliminate the middle man, there is far less room for error and higher chance for greater profit.
d.
Mutual funds, by nature, are a mutual agreement between company and investor, and failure to comply on either side presents reprecussions, the fear of which lowers the risk of the investment.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
Why was the pension issue relevant to the politics of cleveland's presidency?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
Which statement is true of both presidential and parliamentary systems of government?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 13:40
What happened at tiananmen square june 4th 1989
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:30
In november 1947, how did the united states try and resolve the issue of palestine?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why would a mutual fund, a collection of stocks, bonds, and other securities, have less risk than in...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.08.2020 23:01
question
History, 14.08.2020 23:01
question
Mathematics, 14.08.2020 23:01
question
Mathematics, 14.08.2020 23:01
question
Mathematics, 14.08.2020 23:01
Questions on the website: 13722367