The Amistad case concerned: A. whether abolitionists in the North had a right to interfere in slavery

B. whether a group of rebel slaves should be returned to their captors

C. what should happen ro runaway slaves caught in the North

D. whether the congressional gag rule about slavery should be overturned​

Supporters of the atomic bomb argued against the idea that the united states should not use the bomb against japan by

In 1944, the supreme court upheld the authority of the u.s. government to order the internment of a minority group in the interest of national security, even though there was no evidence that any members of this group were disloyal to the united states. should the same policy be applied today against u.s. muslims or muslim immigrants? why or why not? are these forms of internment different from native reservations? if so how? if not, why?

Why did the national government under the articles of confederation face bankruptcy?