Write a critique of the two speeches given at the Berlin Wall by President Kennedy and President Reagan on which speech was more effective. You should address your critique to future world leaders. You will notice that although both speeches hope to change the thinking of the Eastern Bloc, each had a different approach. Within your critique, you need to propose a claim and counter claim that identifies the most effective speech. Make sure you support your ideas with key details from the speeches, as well as with facts. Your concluding statement should ask future leaders to include the techniques you found most favorable. Focus on the following questions to help you prepare your essay: What was Kennedy’s approach?
What was Reagan’s approach?
How are the speeches similar?
How are they different?
Which speech do you think was most effective? Why?
Why would other listeners disagree?

detente translated to english means politics

when studying cause and effect, historians usually group the causes into different categories. for example, cultural causes reflect how a society’s literature and art convey the way the society saw itself in relation to the rest of the world. another resource that historians use to understand society is pop culture, which tells them the trends and ideas that are preferred by the common people. when studying cause and effect, it’s important to remember multiple causation, or the idea that an effect could have several causes and vice versa.  

the correct option is “cultural causes” since art and literature are related to the culture of a place. culture is determined by literature, art, music.

the correct option is “pop culture” since it reflects the likes and ideas of common people whereas the rest of the options do not focus on common people.  

the correct option is “multiple causation” since it refers to the idea that events are caused by multiple reasons, not just a single one.  

letter a is the answer