New technology often makes life better for people. Scientists, however, sometimes think that industry and making new technology have negative consequences. Which of the following would be a negative long-term consequence of growing industry and making new technology? A. decreased income for employers B. increased levels of pollution C. increased job availability D. decreased standard of living

Over the years, technology has revolutionized our world and daily lives. Technology has created amazing tools and resources, putting useful information at our fingertips. ... With all of these revolutions, technology has also made our lives easier, faster, better, and more fun.

Explanation:

The thing is that technology gives us more than automation and the ability of providing service at a lower cost. It also gives us the opportunity to gather customer data, analyse customer data and use the data analysed to better meet customers' needs.New technologies reduce the prices of goods and services to which they are applied. They also lead to the creation of new products. Consumers benefit from these improvements, regardless of whether they live in rich or poor countries. ... These are instances of technology improving the lives of poor people.

it's propbably A (not sure tho)

make me brainliestt :))

for starters, there is the structural trend of rising primary government expenditure as a share of gdp, which reached 36% in 2014, up from 22% in 1991. this increase reflected a political desire to address the poverty and inequality that had gone unaddressed during previous decades. to support the increase, brazil’s government increased taxes on consumption and promoted progress toward labor-market formalization. nonetheless, public investment, particularly in infrastructure, took a hit. in fact, with the exception of the 2005-2008 period, total investment as a share of gdp has remained below 20% since 1991.