Historians, judges, and political leaders often debate how best to interpret the US Constitution. Watch a video and read an article on this debate. Make notes on the differences between loose constructionism and originalism. Fill in the table below with examples of positive and negative aspects of these competing theories. brainliest to whoever can answer this

trust me it's right

Explanation:

Loose constructionism

Bending the construction

Positives

•Applies to modern day

•protects citizens from outdated rules/concepts

•protecting civil liberties and considering circumstances

Negatives

•Can go against the ideals of the founding fathers

•Can be bent to negatively affect citizens

•Can throw off the balance of the country

Originalism

Strictly ruling to the original constitution forever

Positives

•Keeps core values of the country intact

•Understanding the society that the constitution prohibited

•Guarantees everyone their rights.  

Negatives

•Some phrases and amendments can be vague, such as what counts as freedom of speech

•does not consider the evolution of society

•does not consider the evolution of weapons

the correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be option b. expanding civil services. diocletian and constantine paved the way for foreign invasion by dividing the empire, creating administrative bureaucracies and reorganizing the military, except for expanding civil services. hope this answer .

click to let others know, how is it

explanation:

`stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar current or future case. stare decisis ensures that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, unless overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the us supreme court. simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

stare decisis is a latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided".