Did forreign nations have the right to threaten the independence of a weakens China to expand their power?

The answer can be defined as follows:

Explanation:

Foreign countries would have no right to threaten a weakened China's freedom by growing its control. China is dominated by large political, economic, and influence a company in international relations. It's indeed unfair to China to threaten independence from Britain for its benefit and the creation of power.

The British claimed it was intended for combat leaders and troops in government who abused the people and to not compete with China. Its point is, nevertheless, that China's rise has a major impact on some other foreign countries.

It would be the major cause of the military catastrophe that threatened China's freedom. Increasing nation fights for power and control. For just this purpose, China can not rise peacefully. By making it very clear to its neighbors as well as the USA that China has peacenik motives and that it would not use force to shift the balance of power, China will alleviate all fears of its rise. Sadly, each other's intentions can never be certain of States.

Today, by slowly building defensive, not aggressive armed units, China can avoid confrontation. Although they did, the foundation would have not collapsed and could continue to rise comfortably without any of the danger of foreign countries interfering. Perhaps surprisingly, Chinese leaders also claim how the military has been primarily designed for defense.

the  equal rights amendment  (era) states: "equality  of  rights  under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the united states or by any state on account of sex." congress first introduced the era in 1923, but the campaign for ratification took off in the 1960s during the  civil rightsmovement.