HEL 1. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the Continental Army
during the Revolutionary War. Be sure to include specific details
and examples in your response.
NO LINKS PLESSEEE

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

the strengths and weaknesses of the Continental Army

during the Revolutionary War.

Strengths.

At the beginning of the Revolutionary War, there were practically no strengths in the Continental Army. We can mention one, the Patriotism and courage of the colonists that fought for the Continental Army.

As the war advanced, one important strength was that European countries such as France and Spain helped the Continental Army financially and with supplies.

The experience and courage of General George Washington.

Weaknesses.

The lack of money, problems of transportation, and poor organization. Under these deplorable conditions, the Continental army had to use the Quartermaster Department to help solve some problems. It asked the states to provide for supplies. Patriots responding sending blankets, food, and other supplies by the effort was not enough. There was no good communication and organization between the Quartermaster and the government of the colonies.

General George Washington knew the Continental Army soldiers were poorly trained and had minimum combat experience. That is why Washington called the help of Prussian military Official Baron Von Steuben during the winter of 1778 in Valley Forge. This Prussian military really helped to train the American troops.

salmon were fished in puget sound.

the industrial development of cities in the ruhr area in the nineteenth century is described. the research was based on english and german language sources. several factors that shaped growth and paths of the cities were categorized and analyzed. they are locations, resources, traditions, entrepreneurs, and technological developments. locations and resources were the most important among them; other factors may be regarded as consequences from locations and resources. among the cities, bochum, essen, gelsenkirchen, and dortmund had the richest resources and most favorable locations in the transportation network and grew to be the largest cities in the ruhr area near the end of the nineteenth century. riverside location was also a favorable factor for the development, as shown in the development of duisburg on the confluence of rhine and ruhr. resource distribution can explain the rise of textile industry, metallurgical industry, and coal and iron industries, and the northward progression of the mining industry. tradition was an important factor for cities such as krefeld, barmen, elberfeld, solingen, and remscheid, which experienced development based on their traditions through the nineteenth century. various entrepreneurs exerted influences within and beyond the local level over the ruhr area. technological development stimulated the northward progression of the mining industry and the deep connection between the coal and the iron industries.