Which of the following best describes the philosophy of the British in colonial matters? [Select all that apply.] —paternalistic
—anarchy
—hands-off
—direct rule

Explanation:

The British usually pursued or at least tried to pursue a paternalistic model of rule in their colonies where they tried to develop their version of civilization whilst putting down cultural practices that they deemed backwards in the hope that the colonies would develop.

In order to reduce the cost of governance, they also practiced a hands-off philosophy where direct rule was left to local leaders who were then accountable to the British local administrators.

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.