Write an introductory paragraph that clearly states your position on ratifying the Constitution, as a Federalist. Write a second paragraph that explains your point of view on how the government is set up under the Constitution.

Write a third paragraph that explains your point of view on including of a bill of rights. Use at least one quote to support your argument. Be sure to explain what the quote means and how it connects to your point.

Write a fourth paragraph to explain why you disagree with the opposing position. For example, if you are writing as a Federalist, you will explain why you disagree with the Anti-Federalist stance. Use at least one new quote to explain why it is not a valid point or how it supports your position.

please help asap ive got bout a day

Write a strong concluding paragraph that summarizes your argument and encourages others to support you.

The Constitution will be approved if it has all the necessary materials.

Explanation:

As a Federalist, I will ratify or approve the Constitution if it has all the necessary materials that is needed to run the country efficiently otherwise it will not be approve at all.

The government is set up under the Constitution by composing of three branches which is the legislative, executive, and judicial. Without these three branches the government will not formed and perform its function.

My point of view on including of a bill of rights is that it is a very important and necessary part of the constitution, without bill of rights the constitution is incomplete.

I disagree with the opposing position of the Anti-Federalist because they are against of more power of the federal government over the states.

answer; /// i believe that the correct answer is (gerrymander or gerrymandering)good luck