In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled on whether police could tap a
public phone without a warrant. Identify one way in which the case is legally
significant.
O A. It led to new laws on who could issue warrants.
• B. It established the idea of a reasonable expectation of privacy.
• C. It determined the legal status of phone booths.
O D. It increased the power of the Supreme Court.
N
SUBMIT

The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.

might be agreeing to participate ethically with other european nations in the slave trade

or notifying other european nations when taking possession   of african territories

the growing interconnectedness of the world through communication, trade, and the exchange of ideas is an important theme in the history of the 20th and 21st centuries.

explanation: