Are civil war monuments truly about heritage? If so, then who's heritage and should that heritage be be celebrated?

Should monuments erected in public places remain for all time without regard for changes in society at large?

Monuments can be used for teaching lessons about the past, so is it better to achieve that by leaving them standing in public but with explanation or removed and placed elsewhere, such as a museum?

protected civil liberties and outlawed slavery in the new territories.

possible the invasion of room could have been avodiable but the people of rome were to stubboron and to wealthy the kingdoms saw them as a threat if they dialred it downa   bit ten i dont think they wouldnt failed   china was not iacvvdoaible they caused war to much and were out of hand therefor that must have happened india i dont really know it could of