one of the con arguments states that the economy won't suffer if copyright law is eliminated. The argument is that when someone is given a shared file rather than spending money to buy it, the money isn't lost to the economy; it’s simply redirected to buy something else, such as the pizza. Is this a fair argument? Why or why not?

to kill a mockingbird is a 1962 american drama film directed by robert mulligan. the screenplay by horton foote is based on harper lee's 1960 pulitzer prize- winning novel of the same name. it stars gregory peck as atticus finch and mary badham as scout. in 2003, the american film institute named atticus finch the greatest movie

hope this : d

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.

because it’s really sad that’s why it’s in history native americans getting kicked out of their homeland.